Miami Lawyer Opposes Continuance Request From Lead Counsel

rawpixel 267082 unsplash 1 - Miami Lawyer Opposes Continuance Request From Lead Counsel

Women in the legal profession often face discrimination and bias, both implicit and overt. This issue was recently thrust into the spotlight when a pregnant lead attorney in a Florida products liability trial, Christen E. Luikart of Murphy Anderson, requested a trial continuance because her due date coincided with the trial date.

In her motion, Ms. Luikart explained that her doctors had advised her not to travel during the final five weeks of her pregnancy, which coincided with the trial date. Opposing counsel, Paul T. Reid of Shook, Hardy & Bacon in Miami, objected to her request, suggesting that the request was a delay tactic, that she became pregnant to delay litigation, and most egregious of all, comparing pregnancy to an illness. Reid argued that, “cases involving illness of counsel” compel the court to take into consideration the request of the continuance, which he called “extreme” since the request included time before her due date. He suggested that Luikart either try the case early or pass the case on to another attorney at her firm. (Of note, Shook Hardy released a statement saying the firm has suspended Reid pending further review by management and Reid’s bio page had been removed from its website.) Luikart responded in part, “I’m not trying to delay anything. I did not get pregnant in response to his motion to strike.” In response to Reid’s suggestion that she pass the case on to another attorney, Luikart told the court, “The client chose me.” The judge agreed and granted a continuance until January 2019. Judge Cymonie Rowe stated, “I don’t believe Ms. Luikart got pregnant in response to this case. I do believe that Ms. Luikart is entitled to have some time to deliver her child and take care of her child bnt to hamper the progress of the case and that her pregnancy was not an illness, is absurd on its face. However, it is the attempt to minimize Luikart’s role as lead counsel that demonstefore coming back to resume her duties as an attorney.”

The fact that Luikart had to defend her pregnancy and explain both that she did not get pregnarates the more subtle bias faced by female attorneys. Luikart was retained by her client as lead counsel and had done the vast majority of the work on the case in the years that the litigation had been going on. Yet Reid attempted to diminish her role in the litigation by implying that she was replaceable and/or that she was not really the lead counsel.

Unfortunately, it is not uncommon for women attorneys who have children to find that their careers suffer as a result. Whether it is the broader issue of advancement or a specific case-related issue such as this case, women in the legal profession regularly face discrimination. It is time that the profession stops seeing pregnancy and motherhood as career impediments and starts supporting women, pregnant or otherwise, in the profession that they have earned the right to be a part of.

To read more about this story click here.

To read more about a proposed parental leave rule in Florida, click here.

There are great resources for women trial lawyers, here are just a few:

National Women Trial Lawyers

NJAJ Women Trial Lawyers Caucus

Tell Us About Your Case

If you can read this, please avoid filling the following input field or your submission may be marked as spam.
Thank you for contacting us! We will be in touch with you shortly.

Recent Entries


Locks Law Firm only provides legal advice after having entered into an attorney client relationship, which our website specifically does not create. Conversations that originate from website messaging, chat or other two way web based engagement  do not create an attorney client relationship. It is imperative that any action taken be done on the advice of counsel. Because every case is different, the description of awards and cases previously handled do not guarantee a similar outcome in current or future cases. The firm practices law in Pennsylvania, New Jersey & New York as Locks Law Firm. Super Lawyers, Best Lawyers in America and other organizations that rate attorneys are not designations that have been approved by the State Supreme Courts or the American Bar Association.