Spain Mexico
Philadelphia, PA Cherry Hill, NJ New York, NY State College, PA 1-866-LOCKSLAW
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Locks Law Firm
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Get Started
  • No win, no fee
  • Free consultation
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • The Team
    • Office Locations
    • Newsroom
    • FAQ
  • About
    • About Us
    • The Team
    • Office Locations
    • Newsroom
    • FAQ
  • Practice Areas
  • Practice Areas
    • All Practice Areas
    • Medical Malpractice and Nursing Home Abuse
    • Environmental and Toxic Torts
    • Catastrophic Personal Injuries
    • Dangerous Drugs & Devices
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Get Started
  • Spain Mexico   Spanish
  • About
    • About Us
    • The Team
    • Office Locations
    • Newsroom
    • FAQ

    One of the most prominent personal injury law firms in the tri-state region, the Locks Law Firm is steadfastly committed to protecting the rights of seriously injured victims.

    Free Case Evaluation
  • Medical Malpractice and Nursing Home Abuse
    • Nursing Home Abuse and Neglect
    • Hospital Acquired Infections
    • Medication Errors
    • Misdiagnosis / Failure to Diagnose
    • Surgical Errors
    • Needle Stick - CRPS

    Medical malpractice is any act by a health care provider that deviates from accepted standards of medical care and results in the personal injury, disability, or wrongful death of a patient. Nursing home abuse or negligence can take many forms. It can include physical, sexual, and emotional abuse, neglect, negligent care, and even financial exploitation.

    Free Case Evaluation
  • Environmental and Toxic Torts
    • Asbestos and Mesothelioma
    • Benzene
    • Chemical Exposure
    • Manganese Exposure
    • Natural Resource Damages
    • Toxic Injuries
    • Workplace Exposure
    • Dacthal Herbicide Ban
    • PERC Exposure
    • Paraquat

    Exposure to toxic chemicals in the workplace or environment can cause serious, sometimes fatal health problems, including cancer.

    Free Case Evaluation
  • Catastrophic Personal Injuries
    • Premises Liability
    • Burns and Chemical Burns
    • Traumatic Brain Injuries
    • Spinal Cord Injuries
    • Wrongful Death

    Catastrophic personal injuries include brain and spinal cord injuries, severe burns, carbon monoxide poisoning and, most seriously, death.

    Free Case Evaluation
  • Dangerous Drugs & Devices
    • Allergan Breast Implant Recall
    • Hernia Mesh
    • IVC Filters
    • NEC Baby Formula

    At the Locks Law Firm, our pharmaceutical litigation and defective drug lawyers are committed to serving personal injury victims and are well versed in the product liability laws that protect consumers.

    Free Case Evaluation

Locks Law Firm

Philadelphia, PA

(215) 893-0100

Cherry Hill, NJ

(856) 663-8200

New York, NY

(212) 838-3333

State College, PA

844-777-2529

Locks Law Firm

Philadelphia, PA

The Curtis Center
Suite 720 East
601 Walnut Street

Cherry Hill, NJ

801 North Kings Highway

New York, NY

675 Third Avenue | 8th Floor

State College, PA

1376 Haymaker Road

Locks Law Firm

Philadelphia, PA

[email protected]

Cherry Hill, NJ

[email protected]

New York, NY

[email protected]

State College, PA

[email protected]

Blog

4th Circuit Invalidates Arbitration Clause in Payday Loan Agreements

Yesterday the Fourth Circuit refused to enforce the arbitration agreement in a Western Sky payday loan agreement in the case Hayes v. Delbert Services Corp.  The Court’s holding is an important reminder that despite the current anti-consumer state of the law on arbitration agreements, these clauses are not invitations to companies to imagine new and exciting ways to strip consumers of their substantive rights.

The Court’s holding on both the issue of the agreements purported waiver of rights as well as severability is instructive on the kinds of challenges that can be brought against unconscionable arbitration agreements.

FACTS

Western Sky was an online lender owned by Martin Webb, a member of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe.  Western Sky’s offices are located on the Cheyenne River Indian Reservation in South Dakota, and from those offices they issued payday loans to consumers across the country.

Hayes, a citizen of Virginia took out a $2,600 loan, which included a $75.00 origination fee, meaning Hayes got $2,525 in his pocket.  Western Sky charged interest on the loan at an annual rate of 139.12%.  Hayes’ monthly repayment was $294.46 over four years, meaning that Hayes was set to pay $14,093.12 over the life of the loan.  Other class members had loan rates up to 233.84% per year.

CLAIMS

Western Sky’s practice was after a loan was made to transfer the loan to allied servicing and collection firms.  Hayes’ loan was transferred to WS Funding, LLC which then named its corporate parent, CashCall, Inc. as the servicing agent.  The loan was then transferred to an entity named Consumer Loan Trust, which in turn named Delbert as the servicing agent.  While Western Sky was owned by a tribal member, Delbert claimed no tribal ownership or affiliation.

Plaintiff claimed that Delbert sent them collection notices without disclosing its identity as a debt collector or the identity of the actual creditor; in violation of the FDCPA and that it used an automatic dialing system to make several calls a week, and sometimes multiple calls a day to their home, in violation of the TCPA.  Hayes filed a putative class action in the Eastern District of Virginia against Delbert.  Hayes also sought declaratory relief that the loan agreement’s forum selection and arbitration agreement clauses were unenforceable.

LEGAL ARGUMENT/HOLDING OF THE COURT

While according to the 4th Circuit no one seriously disputed that the Western Sky’s loans violated a “host of state and federal lending laws”, the Defendant argued that the terms of the agreement barred the suit.

Agreement Terms:

The agreement provided in various sections:

“This Loan Agreement is subject solely to the exclusive laws and jurisdiction of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, Cheyenne River Indian Reservation… you, the borrower,…consent to the sole subject matter and personal jurisdiction of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribal Court, and that no other state or federal law or regulation shall apply to this Loan Agreement, its enforcement or interpretation.”

“Neither this Agreement nor Lender is subject to the laws of any state of the United States of America.  By executing this Agreement, you hereby expressly agree that this Agreement is executed and performed solely within the exterior boundaries of the Cheyenne River Indian Reservation, a sovereign Native American Tribal Nation.  You also expressly agree that this Agreement shall be subject to and construed in accordance only  with the provisions of the laws of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, and that no United States state or federal law applies to this Agreement.”

An arbitration clause provided:

“[A]ny dispute [the borrower] ha[s] with Western Sky or anyone else under this loan agreement will be resolved by binding arbitration.”

The arbitration is to be “conducted by the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribal Nation by an authorized representative in accordance with its consumer dispute rules and the terms of this agreement.”

The arbitration clause further provided that it covers “any claim based upon marketing or solicitations to obtain the loan and the handling or servicing of [the borrower’s] account whether such Dispute is based on a tribal, federal or state constitution, statute, ordinance, regulation or common law, and including any issue concerning the validity, enforceability, or scope of this loan or the Arbitration agreement.”

The arbitration agreement further provided that the agreement “IS MADE PURSUANT TO A TRANSACTION INVOLVING THE INDIAN COMMERCE CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND SHALL BE GOVERNED BY THE LAW OF THE CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE.  The arbitrator will apply the laws of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribal Nation and the terms of this Agreement.”

The agreement did provide that the borrower “shall have the right to select” the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”), Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services (“JAMS”), or another organization to “administer the arbitration.”  The Court noted that this clause was apparently inserted into the agreement after the initial drafting because the tribal arbitration mechanism set out in the agreement “proved to be illusory.”

Holding of the District Court

The District Court held (1) the forum selection clause was unenforceable; (2) the doctrine of tribal exhaustion did not apply to the controversy; and (3) the arbitration clause was enforceable.

The Fourth Circuit reversed, holding “This arbitration agreement fails for the fundamental reason that it purports to renounce wholesale the application of any federal law to the plaintiffs’ federal claims.“

Waivers

Defendant argued that the prospective waiver of federal law in the arbitration agreement was enforceable.  The Court disagreed, noting “[w]ith one hand, the arbitration agreement offers an alternative dispute resolution procedure in which aggrieved persons may bring their claims, and with the other, it proceeds to take those very claims away.  The just and efficient system of arbitration intended by Congress when it passed the FAA may not play host to this sort of farce.”

The Court noted that the Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld arbitration agreements that give an authority to arbitrate federal statutory rights, and which contain waivers providing that arbitration is to proceed on an individual basis, or impose other procedural requirements on potential claimants.  The Court however, held that these provisions do not permit a “prospective waiver of a party’s right to pursue statutory remedies.”  (Citing American Express v. Italian Colors and Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler-Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.)  The Court held that the clause at issue “almost surreptitiously waives a potential claimant’s federal rights through the guise of a choice of law clause.”  The Court held that while a party to an arbitration agreement “may of course agree to waive certain rights as part of that agreement” those waivers must pass “the applicable knowing and voluntary standard” in order to be enforced. (citing Syndor v. Conseco Fin. Servicing Corp.)  The Court held that a choice of law clause in an arbitration clause may chose a local law to govern the arbitration, they may not “underhandedly convert a choice of law clause in to a choice of no law clause –it may not flatly and categorically renounce the authority of the federal statutes to which it is and must remain subject.”

Severability

The Court further refused to sever the “errant provisions” from the remainder of the arbitration agreement.  The Court held that “the offending provisions go to the core of the arbitration agreement.  It is clear that one of the animating purposes of the arbitration agreement was to ensure that Western Sky and its allies could engage in lending and collection practices free from the strictures of federal law.”  The Court continued that “although our focus must be on the arbitration agreement, not the underlying loan agreement, it is only natural for us to interpret the agreement in light of the broader contract in which it is situated.”

In examining the agreement the Court found that “Western Sky’s arbitration agreement is little more than ‘to achieve through arbitration what Congress has expressly forbidden.'”  The Court continued “[g]ood authority counsels that severance should not be used when an agreement represents an ‘integrated scheme to contravene public policy.’” (Citing Graham Oil v. Arco Products Co.) (which in turn was citing Farnsworth on Contracts)

Conclusion of the Court

The Court closes with the hope that “in the future companies will craft arbitration agreements on the up-and-up and avoid the kind of mess that Delbert is facing here.”

James Barry

Guest Author
February 3, 2016 James Barry

Tell Us About Your Case

If you can read this, please avoid filling the following input field or your submission may be marked as spam.
Thank you for contacting us! We will be in touch with you shortly.
Uh oh. There was a problem processing your request. Please try again!
Previous Entry

Alfred M. Anthony Joins Locks Law Firm

Next Entry

Legendary N.F.L. Player Ken Stabler Diagnosed with C.T.E.

Recent Entries

  • IARC’s Latest Evaluation: Automotive Gasoline Causes Cancer
  • How Personal Technology Can Help You Navigate Legal Matters
  • Seeking Justice: Locks Law Firm Represents Victims of Northeast Philadelphia Plane Crash
  • "Judicial Hellhole"
  • Dacthal Pesticide Ban: EPA Falls Short Again, Inaction Fails to Protect the Unborn 

Archive

  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • December 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • January 2023
  • August 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • February 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • September 2011
  • January 2011
  • November 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
1-866-LOCKSLAW
[email protected]
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
2021 Best Lawyers
Martindale-Hubble Award Ten Leaders

Copyright © 2025 Locks Law Firm. Made by Mindlark.

Locks Law Firm only provides legal advice after having entered into an attorney client relationship, which our website specifically does not create. Conversations that originate from website messaging, chat or other two way web based engagement  do not create an attorney client relationship. It is imperative that any action taken be done on the advice of counsel. Because every case is different, the description of awards and cases previously handled do not guarantee a similar outcome in current or future cases. The firm practices law in Pennsylvania, New Jersey & New York as Locks Law Firm. Super Lawyers, Best Lawyers in America and other organizations that rate attorneys are not designations that have been approved by the State Supreme Courts or the American Bar Association.